person · P0503 · geonim
Shimon Kayyara רב שמעון קיירא
The author history settled on for the Halachot Gedolot (Halachot Gedolot) — a Babylonian scholar outside the gaonate, remembered from Basra, who built the geonic era's great code out of Halachot Pesukot and the Bavli. Even his century is a machloket: ibn Daud set him before Yehudai Gaon, and the geonim's own testimony sets him two generations after.
Who
- Hebrew
- רב שמעון קיירא
- Also known as
- Simeon Kayyara, Shimon Kaira
- Era
- geonim
When
- Traditional
- placed by Sefer HaKabbalah in the mid-8th c., before Yehudai Gaon — a dating the geonim's own testimony reverses
- Civil (computed)
- 4500–4610 AM · 740–850 CE
- Academic
- fl. c. 825–850 CE, Basra
- Lifespan (traditional)
- ≈110 years
- Precision
- disputed
How do we know
| Claim | Evidence | Confidence | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
| The dominant view, medieval and modern, names Shimon Kayyara as the author of Halachot Gedolot; he held no gaonate and appears in no succession list — a private scholar whose book outranked the office. The authorship edge on Halachot Gedolot is drawn on this attribution, against the minority ascription of the work to Yehudai Gaon found in some rishonim. | tradition reconstruction | ★★★☆☆ |
|
| His dating is the classic confusion the audit records: Avraham ibn Daud's Sefer HaKabbalah places him in the mid-8th century, before Yehudai Gaon — which would make Halachot Pesukot the borrower — while the geonim's own testimony and the BeHaG's demonstrable use of Halachot Pesukot reverse the order, dating him c. 825–850. The AM span above covers both positions rather than pretending to a precision the sources lack.
Mirrors Halachot Gedolot's dates block (precision: disputed) — person and book are dated by the same contested evidence.
|
tradition reconstruction | ★★★☆☆ |
|
| His code absorbs Halachot Pesukot (Halachot Pesukot) nearly whole and expands it across the Bavli's practical tractates — the basis of the reception-from-writings edges drawn here: a scholar whose attested teachers are none, and whose attested library is plain on every page. | reconstruction | ★★★☆☆ |
|