person · P0435

Pekach פקח

The officer who killed Pekachyah and reigned as Assyria closed in. Allied with Retzin of Aram against Yehudah (the crisis of Yeshayahu 7 — "the son of Remalyahu"), he lost Gilead, the Galil, and all Naftali to Tiglath-Pileser, who exiled them — the first stage of the northern exile. Hoshea's conspiracy against him is confirmed from the Assyrian side. No parent edge: usurper.

I. Who

Hebrew
פקח
Also known as
Pekah, Pekach ben Remalyahu
Era
bible

II. When

Traditional
c. 3146–3196 AM (reigned 3176–3196, twenty years)
Academic
reigned c. 736–732 BCE (the stated twenty years overlap earlier reigns)
Lifespan (traditional)
≈50 years
Precision
approximate

V. How do we know

ClaimEvidenceConfidenceSources
In the fifty-second year of Azaryah king of Yehudah, Pekach ben Remalyahu became king over Israel in Shomron — twenty years.
The twenty years sit awkwardly with the synchronisms; chronologists ancient and modern count much of the span as overlapping rival reigns. The atlas chains the stated figure schematically.
biblical ★★★★★
In the days of Pekach king of Israel, Tiglath-Pileser king of Assyria came and took Iyon, Avel-Beit-Maachah, Yanoach, Kedesh, Chatzor, the Gilead, and the Galil — all the land of Naftali — and exiled them to Assyria. biblical ★★★★★
Hoshea ben Elah conspired against Pekach, struck him and killed him, and reigned in his place; Tiglath-Pileser III's annals state the same transition from the Assyrian side: "They overthrew their king Pekah (Pa-qa-ḫa), and I placed Hoshea (A-ú-si-ʾ) over them as king."
A rare double witness: the same royal succession recorded in Kings and in the Assyrian annals.
biblical external archaeology ★★★★★
The placement (reigned 3176–3196 AM) is a schematic Mesorah Atlas reconstruction: the northern kings' regnal years stated in Kings are chained forward from the division of the kingdom in 2964 AM, with sub-year reigns counted as zero; the chain closes exactly at the fall of Shomron in 3205 AM (Chizkiyahu's sixth year, Melachim II 18:10). The cited source states the reign's length, not absolute dates.
The cited sources establish relative chronology or regnal duration; they do not state the absolute AM range.
tradition reconstruction ★★☆☆☆