text · B0042

Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer פרקי דרבי אליעזר

The great narrative midrash — Bereishit and Shemot retold as one continuous story under the name of R' Eliezer ben Hyrcanus. Written centuries after him, in the first generations under Islam, it became a house source for later tradition: Rashi cites it, and the Zohar breathes its air.

I. Who

Hebrew
פרקי דרבי אליעזר
Also known as
PDRE
Era
geonim

II. When

Traditional
transmitted under the name of R' Eliezer ben Hyrcanus, the tanna
Civil (computed)
4460–4600 AM · 700–840 CE
Academic
composed c. 8th–9th c. CE, after the rise of Islam
Duration
≈140 years
Precision
disputed

IV. What

Language
Hebrew
Redaction
Anonymous, post-Islamic. The work opens with the story of the young R' Eliezer ben Hyrcanus (Rabbi Eliezer ben Hyrcanus) leaving his father's fields for Torah, and speaks throughout in his name — a framing the atlas records per the printed letter as the work's own presentation, not as authorship.
Structure
Fifty-four chapters of continuous narrative aggadah — creation, the merkavah, the avot, the exodus, and the wilderness — woven with cosmology, calendar reckoning, and chapters that track ritual practice (shofar, milah, havdalah); the received text breaks off before its announced plan completes.

V. How do we know

ClaimEvidenceConfidenceSources
The work presents itself as the teaching of R' Eliezer ben Hyrcanus, opening with the story of his youth and attributing its chapters to him throughout; per the atlas's printed-letter policy this self-presentation is recorded as stated — the provenance speaks for itself — and no author edge is drawn to Rabbi Eliezer ben Hyrcanus.
The pseudo-attribution call: tradition transmits the work under R' Eliezer's name, but no tradition claims he wrote a book; authored_by is reserved for named-author works, so the ascription lives here as a claim.
tradition ★★★★☆
Composition is post-Islamic: the work reads the dominion of Yishmael as the final kingdom, names Yishmael's wives Aisha and Fatima, and reflects institutions of the early Islamic centuries — grounds on which scholarship dates it to the 8th–9th century, making it a pseudepigraphic composition rather than a redacted school-corpus. reconstruction ★★★★☆
Its dating debate is layered like Tanchuma's: the narrative frame and Islamic-era horizon are late, but the work transmits much older aggadic and mystical material (merkavah, calendar lore), so scholars distinguish the book's date from its traditions' dates. reconstruction ★★★☆☆
  • R. Adelman, The Return of the Repressed: Pirqe de-Rabbi Eliezer and the Pseudepigrapha (2009)